<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Finder needs the fire rekindled</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nutmac.com/2008/02/05/finder-needs-the-fire-rekindled/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nutmac.com/2008/02/05/finder-needs-the-fire-rekindled/</link>
	<description>don't go crazy... GO INSANELY FAST!</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.nutmac.com/2008/02/05/finder-needs-the-fire-rekindled/#comment-618</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 18:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nutmac.com/index.php/2008/02/05/finder-needs-the-fire-rekindled/#comment-618</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;As you'll see &lt;a href="http://www.nutmac.com/index.php/2007/07/30/pathfinder-is-the-only-finder-you-need/" title="Path Finder is the only Finder you'll ever need" rel="nofollow"&gt;by this article&lt;/a&gt; I couldn't agree with you more. I am a huge power user of Path Finder. That's where most of my frustration with Apple stems from. What CocoaTech is doing with Path Finder isn't what I would consider alternative thinking, it's filling the pot holes left in Apples own Finder. Path Finder is what Finder should be.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you&#8217;ll see <a href="http://www.nutmac.com/index.php/2007/07/30/pathfinder-is-the-only-finder-you-need/" title="Path Finder is the only Finder you'll ever need" rel="nofollow">by this article</a> I couldn&#8217;t agree with you more. I am a huge power user of Path Finder. That&#8217;s where most of my frustration with Apple stems from. What CocoaTech is doing with Path Finder isn&#8217;t what I would consider alternative thinking, it&#8217;s filling the pot holes left in Apples own Finder. Path Finder is what Finder should be.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.nutmac.com/2008/02/05/finder-needs-the-fire-rekindled/#comment-617</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 17:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nutmac.com/index.php/2008/02/05/finder-needs-the-fire-rekindled/#comment-617</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I gave up on Finder long time ago, it's just not usable. Even the Windows Explorer is a pleasure to work with in comparison to Apple's Finder.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For serious file browsing I recommend PathFinder, it's a really nice finder replacement and has tabs and every little thing you've ever wanted. ;)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Greetings&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gave up on Finder long time ago, it&#8217;s just not usable. Even the Windows Explorer is a pleasure to work with in comparison to Apple&#8217;s Finder.</p>

<p>For serious file browsing I recommend PathFinder, it&#8217;s a really nice finder replacement and has tabs and every little thing you&#8217;ve ever wanted. <img src='http://www.nutmac.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>

<p>Greetings</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
